Bankruptcy Lawyers Chicago
Feeds
divorce-lawyers-sanantonio
chicago-child-visitation-lawyer
bankruptcy-lawyers-indianapolis
divorce-lawyers-indianapolis
womens-divorce-lawyers
bankruptcy-lawyers-phoenix
bankruptcy-lawyers-dallas
chicago-child-custody-lawyer
bankruptcy-lawyers-losangeles
bankruptcy-lawyers-sandiego
bankruptcy-lawyers-chicago
divorce-lawyers-chicago
bankruptcy-lawyers-lasvegas
divorce-lawyers-sanjose
bankruptcy-lawyers-newyork
divorce-lawyers-phoenix
divorce-lawyers-losangeles
divorce-lawyers-dallas
bankruptcy-lawyers-sanjose
divorce-lawyers-newyork
divorce-lawyers-sandiego
chicago-child-support-lawyer
bankruptcy-lawyers-sanantonio
bankruptcy-lawyers-philadelphia
divorce-lawyers-philadelphia
divorce-lawyers-lasvegas
zfeeder
1888elimidebt
1 Before Filing [Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:18:35 +0000]
Satisfy Your Credit Counseling Requirement Before Filing Bankruptcy 1 Before Filing

Satisfy Your Credit Counseling Requirement Before Filing Bankruptcy
1 Before Filing

1 After Filing [Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:17:51 +0000]
2-Hour Personal Financial Management Instructional Course 1 After Filing

2-Hour Personal Financial Management Instructional Course

1 After Filing

Retirement [Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:42:34 +0000]
Whether a spouse may rely on his retirement as a change in circumstances to justify the modification of maintenance depends upon the circumstances of each individual case; relevant factors include his age, health, motives and timing of retirement, ability to pay maintenance after retirement, and the former spouse’s ability to provide for herself.

Whether a spouse may rely on his retirement as a change in circumstances to justify the modification of maintenance depends upon the circumstances of each individual case; relevant factors include his age, health, motives and timing of retirement, ability to pay maintenance after retirement, and the former spouse’s ability to provide for herself.

Proceedings on Remand [Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:30:55 +0000]
Where a change in the economic circumstances of one or both of the parties occurred between the remand and the new hearing, the wife’s proper recourse was to file a motion for modification pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, in which she could have presented any evidence of a substantial change in circumstances.

Where a change in the economic circumstances of one or both of the parties occurred between the remand and the new hearing, the wife’s proper recourse was to file a motion for modification pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, in which she could have presented any evidence of a substantial change in circumstances.

Burden of Proof Not Met [Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:46:55 +0000]
The standard for modification due to cohabitation was not met where former spouse’s roommate made only one contribution toward household expenses, the couple did not have a joint checking account and did not commingle funds in any manner, wife’s cohabitation with roommate did not affect her need for support, maintenance payments were not used to [...]

The standard for modification due to cohabitation was not met where former spouse’s roommate made only one contribution toward household expenses, the couple did not have a joint checking account and did not commingle funds in any manner, wife’s cohabitation with roommate did not affect her need for support, maintenance payments were not used to support roommate, couple seldom ate together, wife never did his laundry, they only occasionally slept in the same bedroom, and wife’s cohabitation with roommate was not on a resident, continuing conjugal basis.

Certain and Definite [Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:42:07 +0000]
The provision for the payment of alimony by husband as “one-half of his salary earned and received as a teacher or employee of the public schools of the City of Chicago, Illinois, as long as he is so employed” was held reasonably definite and certain.

The provision for the payment of alimony by husband as “one-half of his salary earned and received as a teacher or employee of the public schools of the City of Chicago, Illinois, as long as he is so employed” was held reasonably definite and certain.

powered by zFeeder